- Resources
- Blanch Wins Insanity Defense: Attempted Murder
- Firm Adds a Valued Client Portal
- The Blanch Law Firm Obtains New Offices
- The Blanch Law Firm Obtains New Offices
- Shoplifting Charges
- Driving While Intoxicated DWI
- The Truth About Getting Your Criminal Case Dismissed
- When the Police Ask to Search You
- Police Interrogations
- Your Constitutional Rights
- Injured? Protect Your Claim
- Types of Injury Claims
- The Best: Why You Can’t Afford Less
- Paying for a Criminal Lawyer in NY
- The Criminal Justice System: Timeline
- Insanity as a Criminal Defense
- Bench Warrants
- About the New York Criminal Courts
- FAQ’s: The Criminal Justice System
- Working with Private Investigators
- Federal Crimes Defense Attorney
- Computer Crimes and the CFAA
- Understanding Federal Bribery
- Introduction to Kidnapping Law
- Antitrust Fines Exceed $300 Million
- Federal Drug Crime Charges
- NY State Criminal Court Guide
- Federal Criminal Procedure Guide
- What To Know Before Hiring a Lawyer
- Criminal Law News Report
- Insanity as a Criminal Defense Explored
- Lawyer Convinces Feds to Dismiss International Export Charges
- Government Out For Blood
- Jury May Have Had Input in Federal Sentence
- The Right to Remain Partially Silent?
- Federal Judge Allowed to Interfere with Plea Negotiations
- Would You do 7 Months for Six Million Dollars?
- Environmental Crimes and the Knowledge Requirement
- Criminal Defense Firm Expands Brooklyn Practice
- Resources
- Blanch Wins Insanity Defense: Attempted Murder
In New York, often one of the first levels of defense attorneys will implement in any criminal case in which physical evidence is at issue, is to dispute the manner in which the evidence was collected at or before arrest. Individuals in this country have the right to unreasonable government searches. The Fourth Amendment guarantees this right. In cases in which attorneys properly assert and successfully defend this right, the prosecution's evidence against the criminal defendant is thrown out through application of the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule is generally the only remedy for the accused when the police or FBI have taken something from the defendant in violation of his or her right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment. Sometimes, this results in the entire criminal case being dismissed. Whether your NY attorney can get your case dismissed based upon unreasonable search and seizure by the authorities depends on whether the D.A.'s entire case hinges upon their ability to present their physical evidence to a jury.
Considering a matter of first impression, the First Circuit held that requiring a blood drawn from a defendant on supervised release, for purposes of creating a DNA profile and entering the profile into a centralized database pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act, did not constitute an unreasonable search and seizure, at least to the extent that the government would not retain the profile after the defendant completed his term of supervised release. The government's important interests in monitoring and rehabilitating supervised releasees, solving crimes, and exonerating innocent individuals outweighed the defendant's privacy interests, given his status as a supervised release, the relatively minimal inconvenience occasioned by a blood draw, and the coding of genetic information that, by statute, could be used only for purposes of identification.
Contact The Blanch Law Firm
The Blanch Law Firm’s Criminal Defense Attorney team is well respected throughout the legal community. Our skill in successfully defending those charged with crimes is highly sought after, and our unique background as prosecutors sets us apart from other law firms. Our Attorneys are based in New York City and primarily defend cases in and around Manhattan, Brooklyn, Long Island, Westchester, the Bronx, Queens and Staten Island.
For Consultations, Contact The Blanch Law Firm at (888) 8 BLANCH.