• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
The Blanch Law Firm

The Blanch Law Firm

Criminal Law Group

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Case Results
    • Testimonials
    • Awards
    • Press
  • Our Team
    • The Attorneys
      • Ryan Blanch
      • Robert Pagan
      • Sumeet Sondhi
      • Marianna Drut
      • John Janiec
      • David Lurie
    • Our Staff
      • Deborah Pereira
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Securities Defense
    • FINRA Defense
    • Health Care Controversies
    • Government Investigations
    • Tax Controversies & Defense
    • 1983 Actions
    • Labor & Employment Disputes
    • Antitrust
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
(212) 736-3900 Free Case Evaluation
GET HELP NOW
CALL US NOW

Bank Owes Over $1 billion in Penalties for White Collar Crimes

May 30, 2019 By Kate Garcia Leave a Comment

White-collar crimes are widespread and can include everything from healthcare fraud to tax evasion, and violations of banking or financial regulations. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, along with several other legal agencies, has finally resolved its investigation into UK-based Standard Chartered Bank and its criminal behavior. As a result, the bank owes over $1 billion in criminal and regulatory penalties. The City and State of New  York stand to receive over $140 million from this penalty.

SCB has agreed to pay this fine after admitting it violated the International Emergency Economic P30owers Act (IEEPA). This is an Act which allows the President to regulate various commercial activities once a national emergency is declared in response to an unusual threat to the U.S. which has a foreign source.

They are accused of processing nearly 10,000 financial transactions of over $240 million through U.S. banks and other financial institutions for the benefit of various Iranian organizations and entities. The Financial Conduct Authority in Britain has also conducted its own investigation, and the bank will be liable for regulatory fines in the U.K.

Unfortunately for SCB, this is not the first time it has been accused of violating the IEEPA.  In 2004, it signed an agreement with both the Federal Reserve and regulator in New York which stated specific changes it needed to make to its internal procedures in order to comply with anti-money laundering legislation. SCB failed to change its ways,  and from 2001 – 2007 it has been accused of circumventing U.S. sanctions and legislating, particularly as it pertained to Iran.

While still under the agreement of 2004, SCB failed to provide adequate responses to official inquiries regarding transactions, and also provided misleading information regarding certain transactions, especially with Iranian customers.  This particular act resulted in SCB paying $670m in regulatory fines. SCB continued to violate sanctions from 2007-2011, which is what the latest round of sanctions is designed to address. They entered into a deferred prosecution agreement  (DPA) in 2012, provided the bank could demonstrate that they were in compliance with regulations. The DPA has been extended three times since.

In 2014, SCB claims that it stopped breaking any sanctions, likely after BNP Paribas was ordered to pay $9 billion for breaking sanctions and shut out of dollar clearing – a record penalty. Yet it seems to some critics that shutting banks out of dollar clearing will hit harder than mere regulatory fines, especially since large banks like SCB continue to increase their profits year after year.

The latest DPA involves SCB admitting that two former employees of its Dubai branch wilfully helped Iranian customers conduct U.S. dollar transactions to benefit Iranian individuals and businesses. According to the indictment, the employee and several co-conspirators registered face trading companies in the UAE, posing them as fronts for money exchanges for business actually located in Iran.

The bank failed to disclose this activity in 2012, resulting in criminal charges for the banker, who pled guilty (but has not yet been identified). This step is unusual, as the  Justice Department has rarely charged individual bankers for facilitating sanctions violations – even for multi-billion dollar transactions as seen with HSBC or BNP Paribas. Perhaps this is a signal of things to come.

Filed Under: The Blanch Blog, White Collar Crimes

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

  • Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Contact Us

  • Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Contact

420 Lexington Avenue

Suite 1402 POB 1057

New York, NY 10170

Contact Now

Phone: 212-736-3900

Attorney Advertising - Disclaimer
© All Rights Reserved. The Blanch Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
    ▼
    • Case Results
    • Testimonials
    • Awards
    • Press
  • Our Team
    ▼
    • The Attorneys
      ▼
      • Ryan Blanch
      • Robert Pagan
      • Sumeet Sondhi
      • Marianna Drut
      • John Janiec
      • David Lurie
    • Our Staff
      ▼
      • Deborah Pereira
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Criminal Defense
    • Securities Defense
    • FINRA Defense
    • Health Care Controversies
    • Government Investigations
    • Tax Controversies & Defense
    • 1983 Actions
    • Labor & Employment Disputes
    • Antitrust
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Contact Us
  • Blog