• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
The Blanch Law Firm

The Blanch Law Firm

Criminal Law Group

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Case Results
    • Testimonials
    • Awards
    • Press
  • Our Team
    • The Attorneys
      • Ryan Blanch
      • Robert Pagan
      • Sumeet Sondhi
      • Marianna Drut
      • John Janiec
      • David Lurie
    • Our Staff
      • Deborah Pereira
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Securities Defense
    • FINRA Defense
    • Health Care Controversies
    • Government Investigations
    • Tax Controversies & Defense
    • 1983 Actions
    • Labor & Employment Disputes
    • Antitrust
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
(212) 736-3900 Free Case Evaluation
GET HELP NOW
CALL US NOW

FAQ: How does a prosecutor decide whether or not to file charges?

August 1, 2016 By The Blanch Law Firm

It is the prosecutor that makes the final decision as to whether to formally charge an individual or not, not the police department or other law enforcement agency.

In most state criminal cases, police arrest individuals and bring the case to the District Attorney’s Office. The police only need probable cause to make an arrest, but the District Attorney’s Office must be able to prove each and every element of each crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction. In federal systems, the investigative work prior to an arrest is usually more substantial.

Prosecutors have discretion on whether or not to charge an individual. They can consider factors such as the strength of the evidence, the individual’s criminal history, the extent of harm or loss allegedly sustained, witness cooperation, resources needed, and weigh it against the interests of justice. Prosecutors have an ethical obligation to pursue only cases they believe they have sufficient evidence to pursue, but this, in practice, is not the only driving factor in the decision to prosecute.

The decision to prosecute also hinges on the particular office’s policies and objectives. The same chain of events could lead to the filing of criminal charges in one jurisdiction, but a decision not to prosecute in another. While office policies and objectives may lead to more decisions to charge than not to charge at the outset, an experienced criminal defense attorney knows that prosecutors will respond to potential weaknesses in cases at later stages in the case, possibly leading to dismissals or increased bargaining power.

Filed Under: The Blanch Blog

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

  • Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Contact Us

  • Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Contact

420 Lexington Avenue

Suite 1402 POB 1057

New York, NY 10170

Contact Now

Phone: 212-736-3900

Attorney Advertising - Disclaimer
© All Rights Reserved. The Blanch Law Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
    ▼
    • Case Results
    • Testimonials
    • Awards
    • Press
  • Our Team
    ▼
    • The Attorneys
      ▼
      • Ryan Blanch
      • Robert Pagan
      • Sumeet Sondhi
      • Marianna Drut
      • John Janiec
      • David Lurie
    • Our Staff
      ▼
      • Deborah Pereira
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Criminal Defense
    • Securities Defense
    • FINRA Defense
    • Health Care Controversies
    • Government Investigations
    • Tax Controversies & Defense
    • 1983 Actions
    • Labor & Employment Disputes
    • Antitrust
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Contact Us
  • Blog